Artigo

Final results of RIGHT Choice: Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy vs combination chemotherapy in premenopausal women with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer

Autor(es): Yen-Shen Lu, MD, PhD,1 Enzal Izwadi Bin Mohd Mahidin, MD,2 Hamdy Azim, MD,3 Yesim Eralp, MD,4 Yoon Sim Yap, MD, PhD,5 Seock-Ah Im, MD, PhD,6 Julie Rihani,7 Erhan Gokmen, MD, PhD,8 Ahmed El Bastawisy, MD,9 Nuri Karadurmus, MD,10 Yeuh Ni Lim, MD,11 Chun Sen Lim, MD,12 Le Thanh Duc, MD,13 Wei-Pang Chung, MD,14 K. Govind Babu, MD,15 Konstantin Penkov, MD,16 James Bowles, BMedSci,17 Teresa Delgar Alfaro, Pharm D, MsC,17 Jiwen Wu, PhD,18 Melissa Gao, MD, PhD,17 Khemaies Slimane, MD,17 Nagi S. El Saghir, MD19

ABSTRACT

Purpose – A head-to-head comparison of efficacy between a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) versus combination chemotherapy (CT) has never been reported in patients with clinically aggressive hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC).

Patients and methods – In this open-label, multi-center, randomized phase 2 trial, pre/perimenopausal women with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2− ABC were randomized 1:1 to first-line ribociclib (600 mg daily; 3-weeks-on, 1-week-off) plus letrozole/anastrozole and goserelin or investigator’s choice of combination CT (docetaxel plus capecitabine, paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, or capecitabine plus vinorelbine). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results – Among 222 patients randomized to ribociclib plus ET (n=112) or combination CT (n=110), 150 (67.6%) had symptomatic visceral metastases, 41 (18.5%) had rapid disease progression per investigator’s judgment, and 31 (14.0%) had symptomatic non-visceral disease. Overall, 106 (47.7%) patients had investigator-assessed visceral crisis. Median follow-up time was 37.0 months. At data cutoff, 31.3% (ribociclib arm) and 15.5% (CT arm) of patients had completed study treatment and transitioned to post-trial access. The median PFS was 21.8 months (ribociclib plus ET; 95% CI, 17.4-26.75 months) and 12.8 months (combination CT; 95% CI, 10.1-18.4 months); hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.87; P=.003. The overall response rates and the median time to response in the ribociclib versus CT arms, respectively, were 66.1% and 61.8% and 4.9 months and 3.2 months (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.55-1.06). Lower rates of symptomatic adverse events were observed in the ribociclib versus CT arm.

Conclusions – First-line ribociclib plus ET showed a significant PFS benefit, similar response rates, and better tolerability over combination CT in patients with clinically aggressive HR+/HER2− ABC.

Keywords – ribociclib, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors, combination chemotherapy, advanced breast cancer, endocrine therapy

Compartilhar em:

Compartilhar em:

Kit-MKT-Breast-Breaking-NewsAvatar
Breast Breaking News
15/05/2024

Comentários

Deixe um comentário

Carrinho de compras